Let’s Go?

Readers, join me and fellow “identity correction” officers from the Yes Lab on a journey to a world in which Royal Dutch Shell does not pretend its plan to drill for oil in the Arctic is a happy, necessary thing. Join me on a trip to a place where Shell tells the truth, where the oil giant says that heading up to one of the last pristine places on earth to do insanely risky industrial work on what amounts to a “trust-us” safety plan is–to put it baldly–nutso.

Journey with me, friends, to Arctic Ready, a satirical website Greenpeace cooked up with Yes Lab to unapologetically speak on behalf of Shell’s Arctic Drilling id about the company’s maniacal profit grab in the Alaskan seas. Come to an imaginary land where Shell gets real and says what its collective brain trust actually thinks:

Er, wait a sec. You say you’ve already left Shell’s land of PR and gone to Arctic Ready on your own? You say you’re one of the thousands of people who have already used the site’s spoof ad generator to create your own version of Shell’s “Let’s Go!” campaign?

Well heck yeah, internet! Thanks!

Sorry to sound so surprised, but truthfully, when we dreamed up ArcticReady.com as a compliment to our #shellFAIL work (more on that here), we weren’t actually expecting you to rush in like you have.

I mean, we had our fantasies, but we weren’t sure if you were as (pardon) Arctic Ready as we hoped you’d be. After all, there’s been a lot of cash spent in the past five years to get you thinking Shell’s way is the only way, but—lo—it turns out, you weren’t fooled by Shell’s PR at all.

You knew what they’re up to, and you jumped at the chance to tell them. And while the overwhelming response to ArcticReady.com undoubtedly shows that Shell isn’t going to have quite as easy of a time in the Arctic as it feels entitled to, it has showed us something, too.

It’s showed us that there are tons of you out there that see Arctic drilling not as Shell wants you to see it—a painless way to keep the engine running—but as it really is: a way for the world’s richest companies to engorge themselves further while the rest of us sweat it out.

Shell may not want to listen to all of you in the reality-based community, but Greenpeace hears you loud and clear. You want the Arctic preserved, not drilled.

Thanks for helping us tell Shell that this expedition to exploit global warming for more of the oil that’s causing global warming in the first place is a call for catastrophe, a crazy invitation for the world to come with Big Oil as it hurtles toward . . . well, actually, you said it best:

Let’s Go? On second thought, let’s not. Let’s keep working on this new, better #SaveTheArctic world instead.

One thought on “Let’s Go?

  1. There WAY too many idiots out there (I know many of them) that would actually agree with and allow these parodies to prop their stance on mindlessly supporting the ‘republican way’ (regardless of what that means: “oil drilling in pristine ocean waters? fracking and polluting all of our drinking water? gay hatred? legislating our wife’s vagina? DO IT! I hate camping, health food tastes like shit, double your money on two headed fish, and my wife is a good church going gal!” if they even think THAT far into it. These shell adds are too subtle. You need to get Louis C.K. or The Daily Show’s Aaasif Mandvi on board to design some humor and realness that cannot be mistaken.
    http://www.boiseweekly.com/CityDesk/archives/2012/06/15/video-the-daily-show-considers-idahos-two-headed-fish

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>